I have
always been keen to watch movies, good ones or much awaited ones, on the very
first day of their release. I like to watch the very first show. I give myself
a false sense of superiority and gain some enjoyment seeing a film before
anyone else. Sometimes not only do I get to experience the pleasure of watching
the film before others, but I also get to tell the ones who didn't show much
interest to begin with that there was a film they could watch. A good film. A
film to look out for. This is one of those films.
A quick
plot review makes it sound like one of the many post-Scorsese gangster tales
which involve a lot of well written moderately profound dialogue and some
stylized violence. Here's the IMDB blurb Jackie Cogan is a professional
enforcer who investigates a heist that went down during a mob-protected poker
game.
I went in expecting a heist gone wrong. I
expected Brad Pitt to be the stone cold ruthless assassin type, great for
action sequences imparting wisdom in forty words and two pop culture
references. I expected Ray Liotta to be a mob boss getting riled up and
spitting out his words at the camera.
A few of my wishes came true. What I truly witnessed was an
allegorical tale of the recession. An economy supported by gambling breaks down.
Troops are sent in to rectify the situation and bring the economy back to its
feet. But the troops aren't as effective as expected. Beneath a layer of cool
criminal speak lies an essay on America and the events that unfolded during the
time period of the 2008 presidential campaigns.
What enhances the film and its core idea are the writing,
the direction and the cinematography. The cinematography is superb. I wouldn't
be surprised if the cinematographer got a nod come Oscar season. A few scenes stand out in my head; a character
injects himself with heroin, a character gets shot. The writing and the
direction are intelligent and well paced. The acting is top notch. Brad Pitt is
stellar as usual and Scoot McNairy gives an authentic performance.
I had one complaint. I greatly admire the use of allegory in
film. But sometimes the allegorical elements are too blunt. District 9 was subtle with its
references to apartheid. This film is just too ham fisted with the direction at
a few points. The allegory is not there for us to pick up. It's hammered home,
repeatedly. And that ticks me off, a little.
All in all a good film. One of the better ones of this year.
The film has the potential to remain a
good film or to be hyped as a great film as it deals with issues close to America (remember The Hurt
Locker? Neither do I).
IMDB Rating: 7.3/10
My Rating: 7.5/10
Watch it in the
theater? Yeah, it's good.
No comments:
Post a Comment